Comparative analysis of the economic efficiency of Chinese sea perch farming industry
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai Ocean University

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

China Agriculture Research System(CARS-49-G29)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Chinese sea perch (Lateolabrax maculatus) is an important farmed species in the coastal area of China. In order to promote the sustainable development of its production sector, this study evaluated the economic efficiency of the sea perch farms located in Zhuhai and Fuding city. The research result revealed that the total unit cost of pond aquaculture farms is the lowest, which is 15.69 yuan/kg. As for the cage farms, the cost range is 31.48 yuan/kg-36.62 yuan/kg. And the cost structure of the above modes had one similarity:the proportion of the variable cost is higher than that of the fixed cost. Because feed cost is the most expensive expenditure for sea perch farming industry. What's more, the break-even and sensitivity analysis stated that the economic performance of the traditional cage farms is the best. Combined with the actual situation, the recommendations are as follows:The value chain of the fish in Zhuhai should be extended; The fish farmers who practiced in cages should adopt advanced technologies to increase the economic efficiency and reduce the pollution;Related departments should inspect the quality of the aquatic fingering industry and the pollution of the production.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

廖凯,张英丽,杨正勇,沈欣,陈博欧,黄明红.中国花鲈不同养殖模式经济效益比较研究[J].上海海洋大学学报,2018,27(4):508-514.
LIAO Kai, ZHANG Yingli, YANG Zhengyong, SHEN Xin, CHEN Bo'ou, HUANG Minghong. Comparative analysis of the economic efficiency of Chinese sea perch farming industry[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2018,27(4):508-514.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:October 16,2017
  • Revised:December 13,2017
  • Adopted:May 14,2018
  • Online: July 16,2018
  • Published:
Article QR Code