泵闸建设对白莲泾河段水质的影响
CSTR:
作者:
中图分类号:

X131.2

基金项目:

国家科技部世博专项 (05ba908b23); 上海市科委重点项目 (05dz05823); 上海市教委重点学科建设项目 (J50701)


Effect of pump-gateway engineering on water quality of Bailianjing River
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [14]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2007年4月-2009年4月对上海白莲泾河段水体环境质量进行了调查,取黄浦江南码头上1个断面和白莲泾上的3个断面,于每月大、小潮当日采集各断面水样,获得了该河段的各项水质指标。2007年10月,白莲泾河道断流,泵闸工程实施。根据监测结果,以DO、BOD5、CODMn、TN和TP为指标参数,利用标准类别指数评价法对建闸工程施工活动的环境影响进行评价,结果发现:TN、TP是白莲泾河段的最主要污染指标,TN的权重系数均超过40%,甚至50%,均为劣Ⅴ类;TP的权重系数均超过10%,甚至30%,其含量是地表水Ⅳ类标准的0.8~5.6倍。总体上,白莲泾河段3个站点的水质劣于黄浦江站点,而施工前水质优于施工后。施工前,大潮期白莲泾河道IV类水比例为29%,较小潮期(8%)高出21%。建闸施工后,大小潮期间出现劣V类水的比例分别为87%和88%,潮汐对白莲泾河段并无显著影响。

    Abstract:

    The investigation on water quality of Bailianjing reach in Shanghai was carried out from April 2007 to April 2009.One cross-section at South Ferry of Huangpu River and three cross-sections at Bailianjing River were chosen and the survey covered both the spring and neap tides throughout the years.The damming of pump-gateway engineering on Bailianjing River was started in October 2007.Five water quality parameters which were dissolved oxygen (DO) , biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) , permanganate index (CODMn) , total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorous (TP) , were used to calculate the standard category index of 4 cross-sections.The results showed that the most important pollutants were TN and TP.Weight coefficients of TN in excess of 40% or even 50%, were over V grade and didn't meet the corresponding water quality standard.Weight coefficients of TP were more than 10% or even 30%, and TP content was 0.85.6 times as high as National Grade IV.In general, water quality of three sites at Bailianjing River was inferior to that of Huangpu River, but the pre-construction water quality was better than building sluiced.Before pump-gateway was constructed, the proportion of IV grade water in Bailianjing River during spring tide period was 29%, 21% above that during neap tide period (8%) .After pump-gateway engineering started, the percentage of the water grade worse than V during spring and neap tide periods was 87% and 88%, showing that tides did not have any noticeable effect on Bailianjing River.

    参考文献
    [1] 杜佳沐, 张饮江, 罗坤, 等.人工浮动绿岛对上海白莲泾水体氮、磷去除效果的研究[J].渔业现代化, 2008, (1) :23-27.
    [2] 潘术香, 李莲芳, 张宝莉, 等.利用标准类别指数评价法评价北京主要水系河流水质[J].农业环境科学学报, 2004, 23 (3) :560-564.
    [3] 国家环境保护总局.HJ/T52-1999水质河流采样技术指导[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 1999.
    [4] 国家环境保护总局国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB3838-2002, 地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2002.
    [5] 范瑜, 师培.标准类别指数法在地表水环境质量评价中的应用[J].江苏环境科技, 2001, 14 (3) :20-22.
    [6] 陈静生.河流水质原理及中国河流水质[M].北京:科学出版社, 2006:101-105, 195-199.
    [7] 张忠样, 钱易.城市可持续发展与水污染防治对策[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1998:34-44.
    [8] 李振国, 葛绪广, 王国祥, 等.潮汐对水质影响的时空相关性分析[J].中国给水排水, 2006, 22 (11) :52-59.
    [9] 聂红峡.水利水电工程施工现场环境保护初探[J].湖北水利水电职业技术学院学报, 2008, 4 (1) :22-25.
    [10] 何强.环境学导论[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2004.
    [11] 叶朝霞, 陆建明, 朱海.嘉兴市城市防洪工程对市区河道水质影响及对策[J].浙江水利科技, 2001, (3) :24-26.
    [12] 刘淑杰, 刘忠熳, 李恩良.供水水库施工期及运行期水质保护措施谈讨[J].黑龙江水利科技, 2002, (3) :142.
    [13] 程绪水, 贾利, 沈哲松.水利工程调度对改善淮河水质的影响分析[J].水系污染与保护, 2004, (1) :38-41.
    [14] 刘生宝.镇扬河段三期综合整治工程对河段水质的影响分析[J].中国水运, 2006, (7) :23-25.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

江敏,黄央央,吴昊,张饮江,荣覃毅,张守坤,罗春芳.泵闸建设对白莲泾河段水质的影响[J].上海海洋大学学报,2010,(5):679-684.
JIANG Min, HUANG Yang-yang, WU Hao, ZHANG Yin-jiang, RONG Tan-yi, ZHANG Shou-kun, LUO Chun-fang. Effect of pump-gateway engineering on water quality of Bailianjing River[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2010,(5):679-684.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:465
  • 下载次数: 651
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-11-22
文章二维码